People speculative trees you make is going to be personal and unsearchable
– open the dna profile page and check if they do have a tree but just not linked (Ancestry) <- about 75% of the people with no trees, do actually have a tree. (If you've not linked your DNA to a tree.. go and do it now!)– go to their main profile page at Ancestry, look for clues as to how long they have been researching (if a long time, then they may have a tree on another site)– check their main page for age range and location ... sometimes people put heaps of really useful info on their profile– google their name/ profile name using some of the clues you may have found – looking for possible hits on who they are. Learn to do advanced google searches.
– write all your clues down, tick them off or cross them out as you validate them/invalidate them.– look for possible trees at wikitree, geni, genes reunited, My Heritage, FMP, etc..– if you’ve now established a possible name, check 192 dot com, white pages, electoral rolls, pipl, etc … where you might find details about them– search for Online obituary’s (especially useful if the established men promo code match is in the US as they often list all their family in detail)– bear in mind woman testers often use their e– on the matches DNA profile page, click on “shared matches”… who else do they match ? You might be able to research the group of shared matches together, working off clues from the shared matches trees. Common Matches is going to be silver when trying to identify and solve a match without a tree.– if they are at Ancestry check if they’ve uploaded to My Heritage, ftDNA or GEDmatch.. can you identify them there (if you can now you will have an email address, for more google searching) .. and also a new set of people who match you both-start building a tree for them , keep it private and unsearchable .. it’s “quick and dirty” so add hints, extra people, whatever you need to try and establish who your match is and their ancestors. This type of tree is often called a “Quick Dirty tree” – due to the fact you are doing it quickly (accept hints if using an online tree), and dirty in that you are not looking for sources at this point you are copying other peoples tree or using hints.
This course of action might take state 2 hours, you select their meets and create its forest and acquire brand new preferred predecessor (quickest You will find over it’s in the 45mins, since the a number of clues decrease towards the lay quickly)However, … Keep in mind you may get nowhere, in which case you research has never attended spend … possibly tomorrow they propose to create a tree, or it rating an alternate shared suits one to reveals ideal clues. (Keep your notes! I keep mine during the OneNote)
Since you begin take with her their theory of whom new match is actually, and just how they connect with you, always get back and attempt and you can disprove they, aren’t getting trapped away which have confirmation bias for which you only lookup to possess clues to show their concept, moreover select clues to disprove they! For example when you discover meets, to return and look that DNA could not provides come from other cousin!
Getting ftDNA suits google its current email address to find out if they keeps a forest somewhere else, or household members information on line
Has just some individuals have confronted the fresh privacy and you can stability away from comparing members of that way. Certainly not are you carrying out something illegal of the searching personal suggestions to discover more on your own meets (their relative in fact). But delight keep look private, for individuals who select one thing your meets (your cousin) probably doesn’t want had written, please think about her or him and stay moral on discussing information you’ve discover. When the the right position appears sensitive and painful, delight treat it as such.